Sunday, February 24, 2013

Are Price Controls the Answer?

A recent article in Time magazine by Steven Brill, "Bitter Pill: Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us," is a brilliantly written expose of the excesses and outrages of health care pricing. In reaction to the story, some have suggested the price controls are the appropriate (or the only) way to rectify the situation. A recent story in the Washington Post's Wonkblog, "Steven Brill’s 26,000-word health-care story, in one sentence," suggests that US health care costs and cost growth are so high because we do not use rate setting, i.e., price controls.

In fact, I think it's not easy to establish whether that is indeed the case. We don't get to use randomized controlled trials for health policies or systems, so it's difficult to figure out how effective a policy like rate setting is. Let me start with some simple examinations of patterns in data to see if something jumps out that strongly supports (or contradicts) the assertion that price controls reduce health care costs.

Starting at the most aggregate level, we can compare the growth rates of spending across countries that use price controls for health care with those that don't. The figure below shows the growth rates of health spending for OECD countries from 2000-2009. The US is the main country with a substantial part of its health sector not subject to price controls. Spending by the privately insured in the US is about 50% of the total, so about one-half of our health spending is not subject to price controls. The Netherlands deregulated prices in their hospital sector starting at 10% in 2005 and moving to 34% in 2009, and also for many physician practices, although it's not clear whether the 2000-2009 growth rate reflects any effects.


There does not appear to be a revealing pattern here -- there are some countries that use rate setting, such as Australia, France, Israel, and Italy that have lower growth rates than the US, and some such as Canada,  Finland, and the UK that have higher growth rates. The US is below the OECD average, whereas Finland is above, as is The Netherlands. While I wouldn't put much weight on anything we see in cross-country differences (there are way too many differences across countries besides price controls), nonetheless nothing striking emerges from these numbers.

Another possible source of information on the effect of price controls on spending is the Medicare program. Medicare fixes the prices it pays doctors and hospitals, so it controls prices. The figure below shows per enrollee growth rates for personal health care expenditures from 1970-2011, as calculated by CMS for services covered both by Medicare and by private insurance (Source here, Table 21).



While examining this figure is clearly not a scientific test (there are many other things undoubtedly driving growth rates of spending), nonetheless, if we see Medicare growth rates consistently lower than private growth rates that would lend at least some preliminary support for the notion that rate setting controls costs. As can be seen, sometimes Medicare spending per enrollee grows faster than private spending, and sometimes the opposite. In particular, Medicare spending slowed dramatically in the mid-1980s after the introduction of the Prospective Payment System for hospitals. Private spending growth fell below Medicare in the early to mid-1990s, most likely due to managed care. More recently Medicare spending has grown more slowly than private spending. Over the entire period the average Medicare growth rate is 8.02%, while private is 9.34%. The patterns here are mixed, but the long run average growth rate for Medicare is lower.

The US does have quite a bit of experience with price controls for medical care at the state level, so we can look at evidence on the effectiveness of these programs. Many states used all-payer rate regulation for hospitals during the 1970s and 1980s. The evidence from these state hospital rate regulation programs indicates a mixed pattern of success. The setup and administration of the program played a large role in whether they were effective. Nonetheless, there is evidence that fi nds that mandatory rate regulation program in a number of states did reduce the rate of growth of hospital expenses (by a little more than 1%). I provide a few references here, for those who are interested. While a 1% reduction in spending growth rates isn't very dramatic, if such an effect occurred and was sustained over time it would lead to a substantial decrease in spending over time.This is probably the most relevant evidence, since if rate setting were to be revived it would almost certainly happen at the state level.

This effect of rate-setting pales, however, compared to the estimates of the impact of managed care from a prominent study, "How Does Managed Care Do It?," which found 30-40% lower expenditures (not growth rates) due to managed care in Massachusetts in the mid 1990s. Another prominent study, "Price and Concentration in Hospital Markets: The Switch from Patient-Driven to Payer-Driven Competition," finds that hospital markups fell substantially in California in the 1980s, primarily due to the growth of managed care.

So what do we conclude? My answer is that we don't know what the impact of rate setting (price controls) would be on health care spending in the US. It's possible that rate setting could prevent some of the most egregious practices recorded in the Brill article, but that depends on what's enacted and how it's enforced. Whether rate setting would substantially slow the rate of growth of health care spending isn't clear. Further, the question that must be asked is what is the alternative? There's evidence to suggest that robust price competition, such as we had with managed care during the 1990s, can perform very well in controlling costs. Unfortunately there has been a tremendous amount of consolidation in health care markets since the 1990s, raising serious challenges to competition. Whether the US decides to go with competition or with regulation, we have some serious work to do to make the system we choose work effectively.



8 comments:

  1. "There’s evidence to suggest that robust price competition, such as we had with managed care during the 1990s, can perform very well in controlling costs."
    __

    The salient question is: what did it do for patients' health?

    JD Kleinke has argued for going forward "manage the disease instead of the money."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good question. There is evidence of lower mortality rates for patients treated at hospitals facing more competition. That appears to be a pretty robust finding. There's much less evidence on other measures of health or quality of care.

      Delete
  2. HOW EDWARD LOAN COMPANY GRANTED ME A BUSINESS LOAN!!!
    Hello everyone, I am Oliver Johnson Moore from Zurich Switzerland and want to use this medium to express gratitude to EDWARD JONES for fulfilling his promise by granting me a loan, i was stuck in a financial situation and needed to refinance and pay my bills as well as start up a Business. I tried seeking for loans from various loan firms both private and corporate organisations but never succeeded and most banks declined my credit request. But as God would have it, i was introduced by a friend named Lisa Rice to EDWARD JONES LOAN COMPANY and undergone the due process of obtaining a loan from the company, to my greatest surprise within 28hrs just like my friend Lisa, i was also granted a loan of $387,000.00; So my advise to everyone who desires a loan, "if you must contact any firm with reference to securing a loan online with low interest rate of 2% and better repayment plans/schedule, please contact EDWARD JONES LOAN COMPANY. Besides, he doesn't know that am doing this but due to the joy in me, i'm so happy and wish to let people know more about this great company whom truly give out loans, it is my prayer that GOD should bless them more as they put smiles on peoples faces. You can contact them via email on {Jonesloanfinance@yahoo.com} or Text +1(307) 241-3712 and you can view our webpage on https://jonesloanfinance.wixsite.com/loan

    ReplyDelete
  3. DO YOU NEED AN URGENT LOAN???
    INSTANT AFFORDABLE PERSONAL/BUSINESS/HOME/INVESTMENT LOAN OFFER WITHOUT COST/STRESS CONTACT US TODAY VIA Whatsapp +19292227023 Email drbenjaminfinance@gmail.com

    Hello, Do you need an urgent loan to support your business or in any purpose? we are certified and legitimate and international licensed loan Company. We offer loans to Business firms, companies and individuals at an affordable interest rate of 2% , It might be a short or long term loan or even if you have poor credit, we shall process your loan as soon as we receive your application. we are an independent financial institution. We have built up an excellent reputation over the years in providing various types of loans to thousands of our customers. We Offer guaranteed loan services of any amount to people all over the globe, we offer easy Personal loans,Commercial/business loan, Car Loan Leasing/equipment finance, Debt consolidation loan, Home loan, ETC with either a good or bad credit history. If you are in need of a loan do contact us via Whatsapp +19292227023 Call/Text +1(415)630-7138 Email drbenjaminfinance@gmail.com
    ®Capital Managements Inc™ 2021.
    Share this to help a soul right now, Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you for every other magnificent post. The place else could anybody get that type
    of info in such a perfect way of writing? I have a presentation subsequent week, and I'm at the
    search for such information.휴게텔

    ReplyDelete
  5. 스포츠토토
    프로토
    메이저사이트

    I used to suggest this web site through
    my cousin. I am no longer sure if this will publish written
    by means of it as no one else realizes such distinct about my problem.

    You are awesome! Thank you !

    ReplyDelete
  6. your site is very interesting.. please visit my webpage

    토토
    토토게임

    ReplyDelete
  7. 스포츠토토
    스포츠토토결과



    Hello there ! Wonderful blog post and quite useful. Good to check your web pages.

    ReplyDelete